Archive page:



Lunchmeat Festival 2026

Debit + Ian Margo & Alexandre Montserrat (Bianjie Systems) present Potpourri AV live © Romana Kovacs

Of Dichotomy and Paradox

As Prague’s frantic summer energy shudders its last, the long hot evenings dissipating into riotous autumn colours and brisk chill, a pensive mood, soon to be shattered, quietly gathers, evocative of the coming fog. Dissecting the city’s ancient heart, the Vltava river, violent under winter rains yet diminished into flat placidity come dry summer: it is dichotomous, vital yet poisoned, wild yet tamed, severing the city into bulbous, misshapen halves just as its aqueous glue makes the place whole.    

On the cusp of seasonal shift, Lunchmeat Festival occupies a paradoxical place; simultaneously slap bang in the middle of Europe and at the fringe of its culture; between the centre and the edge, dichotomy and paradox; in the void space between question and answer, contradiction.

Nearly two decades of events has cemented Lunchmeat as arguably the most influential of Czechia’s nightlife fixtures, impacting the region’s cultural fingerprint on the micro/individual and macro/social levels — its fashionable sonics, the structure and artistic/aesthetic focus of emerging acts. It’s not hard to see why: it’s one of Czechia’s few grand-scale annual events, corralling many large or must-see acts together under one ticket fee within the nation’s capital. 

Pilgrimage is often a core component of what makes a festival — the joy of the event is multiplied by the effort to reach it — but Lunchmeat is a rare occasion that summons the sacred to home, offering convenient access to an enticing world that often goes on all about Prague, but seldom in our midst. Ritual and inner journey therefore feel more prevalent; returning annually allows the shifts to ring louder, and iterative change becomes central to the experience. 

Memory and continuity, deviance and development: it is never the same person, nor the same river, twice; but a baptism by definition alters the individual — how many submersions, before nothing is the same? What portion of oneself is lost with each cleansing? 

What honours a festival’s lineage, and what shirks away from the past? How is it repeating itself, and how is it not? 

What changes to the river itself? 

With many questions seeking answers, I held a short Q&A on the festival’s specific approach to programming with Jirka Kredenc, co-founder and curator of the festival. From the outset, his answers challenged certain inbuilt assumptions: regarding the “direction” of this year’s edition, I was instead redirected with the image of a “mosaic… a jigsaw puzzle that sends out an impulse to insert the next piece only at a specific moment”; a curious metaphor, one which seeks to unpick the warp and weft of time’s consecutive tapestry in favour of rhizomatic sprawl. 

Curiouser still, Kredenc informs that Lunchmeat doesn’t pursue unity throughout the mosaic, but rather “a contrast”, one that hopes to engage and challenge the audience with “the widest scope of dramaturgy and combining the expected with the unexpected”, all the while placing acts together which “defy any sort of cohesion, or definitive line”: not monotone harmony, but rather a yin-yang image of sharply defined edges demarcating one another. 

Fitting that the answers given are so contradictory to my probing questions: “Advanced Electronic Music and New Media Entertainment” might be Lunchmeat’s byline, but its present form suggests the established credo’s melting solidity. Draped cloth, elaborate puppets and the artist among the audience were seen to replace the formula of stageside musician and visual artist hunched over laptops; performance, and vivid human presence, instead of the communal yet private sensory experience, on-screen and in-ear, of Lunchmeat’s past. 

This is clearly fruit of the festival’s search for “the broadest possible scope of what an audiovisual work can represent,” a search that frankly feels a necessary development after attending for six consecutive years and imagining the preceding eleven: robotic powersuits, DIY hard- and software, and inventive approaches to sound and light dominated previous editions, but sometimes invoked a sterile technological feel, result of the intentional sublimation of the essential mortal element in music and art.

Similarly, thanks to Autechre being the first name announced, it was hard to reify Lunchmeat’s unspoken manifesto of “no headliners”; truthfully, this scarcely repeated slogan feels more directed at the festival’s consistent intention to elevate emerging acts from the local region, and  to try to avoid having a singular source of gravity. 

Lunchmeat also has a motto — “See You Dancin’” — which this year also felt a contradiction: the presence of multiple live dance music acts, formerly a major component of the festival’s terroir, was noticeably missing. There’s a subliminal cheekiness to this mantra which feels especially prominent this year: Autechre perform in the dark. 

Lunchmeat’s challenge to the audience to appreciate each act is facilitated through a one-act-at-a-time approach. There’s no clashes, and no acts missed because you weren’t in the right queue for the right building an hour beforehand, halfway across the city from the next must-see show. In this, the festival’s sometimes brutal approach to cohesiveness feels most apparent; all share a broadly similar experience, with the discerning measure being an individual’s taste, curiosity, and persistence in selfishly pushing to the front to carve an experience against the whirling throng. 

At times it’s a battle: this year, each day sold out at a higher capacity than ever before, and sometimes the room was pressed beyond bursting. The logistical issue of squeezing the same number of people into a room far less than half the size presents a question of its own: if Lunchmeat gets any bigger, will it be forced to rethink the “one-act-a-time” format that’s been its calling card for more than a half-decade? 

Lunchmeat endeavours in “a constant search for interesting, fringe projects” to share with its wider audience, but is nonetheless bound to more commercially-minded bookings designed to fill the room. Bringing such a plethora of foreign names to the country comes with economic complications for a somewhat sidelined territory still with its endemic Koruna, weak against the Euro: sustained local and regional cultural funding — paradoxically both the lifeblood and the hewing axe — is essential to the festival’s potential growth, the continuation of its production, and its mission to “to present acts that few people have heard of”. 

In such a pressure system of awareness, partnerships are essential; the further afield, and the higher calibre, the better. Past editions saw elevated presence from Planet Mu- and SVBKVLT-releasing artists, among other labels and institutions, and 2026 saw changes, but not to the pattern: longstanding friends MUTEK Montreal flew Tati Au Miel over for the opening concert in the Ankali nightclub, and “As Nature” — an ambient A/V work jointly-commissioned with ​​Rewire and the Barbican Centre — from KMRU, Nick Verstand, and Mareike Bode was a key early exciter on the lineup. 

KMRU’s performance was subtly chromatic, like gazing long enough into the stars that you start to see red, gold, green and blue in alternation, not merely a blanket of dark pricked with points of light. These subtle tricks of sound were hammered home by Verstand’s gentle coloured reworking of the space with minimal lighting snuck into corners, while directly overhead a long blue shroud floated in the crosswinds forged by fog machines and the cumulative breath of the packed room. Mareika Bode’s contribution to the work, a custom scent, was sadly absent, or perhaps suppressed under the whelm of the many people. 

International artists passing by Lunchmeat speak of the festival as a high water mark in its field, not only for its audiovisual specialisation but also its technical prowess and consultancy, but the offering to local artists is greater: an agnostic stage that, with varying success, eschews the leaderboard and the hierarchy that pervades so many other aspects of music culture. The fingerprint of Lunchmeat’s influence is frequently felt in local performances, as is the unification of the music and arts scenes in this small city, showcasing the essential interconnectivity and collaboration at place in the city’s finest works and honouring Kredenc’s avowal that “each slot dedicated to local artists presented a highly distinct approach to creation”.

Technological marvels and mechanical props certainly took a backfoot this year, but were not entirely absent: DJ GÄP and Isama Zing’s ‘Prelude for Light and Fog’ focussed on the raw, haptic-driven sonics of MIDI-manipulated lasers, lights, and fog machines. Rendered curiously inept by being forced into the primary role, these machines squeaked and scratched, producing rhythm and sound to the duo’s programming; it was brief, perhaps necessarily so, but a demonstration of technological novelty coupled with the desire to step away from what is typical. 

Seeking the same ends, “Tangled in Narratives” brought together many minds (Natálie Pleváková, Magdalena Rybanská, Jan Matýsek, Jitka Sara Pániková, and Antonín Gazda) for the debut performance of the newly-minted persona nan Cifra. The focal performer (Pleváková), followed with videocameras linked to the screen, played a coarse but structured sound heavily informed by post-club collage, which unevenly flowed over the rocks of chronology. Mirroring the many small silences between songs or acts, an object with bodily appendages reminiscent of an instrument which Kredenc describes as being “elevated… to the level of an actual performer”. ‘Harpo’ by name, it remained stationary centre-stage: as a “performer” of its own right it was less than actively present, but rather lingering as a ghost, waiting for seldom touch. 

Later, on the grand stage, Miriam Kardošova’s “I tell her to speak” performance took things in a more radical and unexpected direction. Her avant-garde theatre was inarguably an outlier even amongst six years’ worth of memories: no grand projection, no radical use of contemporary equipment, no boldly inventive instrument. As we enter, Kardošova stands centre-stage, stringently strumming a guitar with a technique best described as intentionally amateur; three backing dancers, faces mutated by masks, murmur indistinctly into a shared mic, out of time and focussed tune. It’s not entirely unpleasant, but it is unsettling; one imagines this to be the aim. 

The scene lasts for a long minute before abruptly halting. The guitar is laid aside, and without rush two hammers are taken to the patient nearby zither with sudden precision and clear skill, and a voice like a strained wind harp creeps from the artist with a decisiveness and precision utterly incongruous compared with the preceding movement. The experience was challenging for an audience primed to witness sleek technological spectacle and musical proficiency; there was palpable confusion in the room, crushed up with the rapt fascination of others, and the overall impression is hard to decipher; certainly, in Kredenc’s words, “one of the most unforgettable memories of this year’s program”. It seems that, even after 17 years, Lunchmeat can still truly blindside regulars and newcomers alike with something deviant from the norm. 

Confronting us with Kredenc’s meaning of “contrast”, PLF (a trio of experimental musicians Peter Kutin, Elvin Brandhi and Lukas König) triggered whiplash on their arrival in Kardošova’s wake. Where Kardošova was unnerving in quiet emptiness, here everything felt enormously packed, tensely composed with rising energy wrought by the artful shrinking of white space. It felt, ultimately, like a jam with three skilled improvisers; there wasn’t a flourishing and orchestrated explosion, but instead a slow and rewarding build. In this the trio stood apart from much of the lineup, and not for its passing similarity to a traditional band (synth, vocal, drum); there was something unknowable in the energy of room, emanating from the players: König’s individualistic drum style snapped sharp up against Brandhi’s electrified shouts and yelps, Kutin’s frictionless noise scattering across the room in lurching starts, chaotic but totally under control.

Giving many in the crowd their fix for raw spectacle was “Passage”; Kevin Peter He controls the big screen’s feed manually through use of a gyroscopic camera, bringing us gradually into, ostensibly, a solarpunk future; an Unreal forest of trees and glowing wires is explored gradually, reaching, to intensifying music, a white flame, whereupon the graphic world’s importance suddenly recedes. Now, FITNESSS, the musical component of the duo, make their presence felt, charging around the entire vast room wielding pole lamps, white and red, throwing themself on the floor amongst engaged onlookers as formless blasts of prefabricated noise careen from the speakers. 

For the front row it was an intense, physically-oriented performance, but for the backline, a strained neck and some confusion as to where the musician was and what they were doing. The performance was ultimately reliant on participatory closeness; with distance to see the full picture, too much felt hurried, even incomplete: the cybernetic deer mounted on their bioplastic legs slide, rather than trot, and at one point the viewer collides with an unfazed individual. 

Perhaps this was why Kosu Nes and Urok stood out much more than it might have in previous years. At the structural level there wasn’t much about it that broke boundaries or expectations, at least for Lunchmeat; one guy with Ableton, another with some video image software manipulating particles into evolving abstract forms. Conversely, the familiarity of format was a genuine cleanser, and from the musical perspective it was one of the highlights, genre-walls adeptly battered down without reservation as the musician rapidly flitted through Djrum-esque hypermutated club music.

Veering far from the product of motherboards and incorporeal pseudo-realities, the seething mass of tangible energy brought by Voronhil and Kuthi Jin instigated immediacy and riot to the masses: Kuthi’s buffeting bass winds ushered us in, his trademark tempestuous sonic experimentalism honed from blunt force to a razor’s edge only to gut itself, and be born again anew. It’s hard to imagine a better backdrop for Voronhil’s blurred mass of body, voice, and intricately woven identity — in their unique case, literally: the act’s calling card was a series of human-esque puppets borne up by both players and crowd, intricately and colourfully crafted with many changeable expressions, that became avatars for their unstoppable flood of noise and sound, a vivid and stunning highlight.

The “club stage” where Kuthi & Voronhil performed was the crucible for the festival’s most energetic moments, and few were more so than B4mba & Mooki6’s NEXUS, a Lunchmeat-commissioned work featuring Barcelona-based artists Akyute. B4mba and Mooki6’s horrorcore-infused snarling drawls and crackling shouts raged within a tight cage of dense bass-driven music, claws reaching out between the bars, symbolic of the project’s focus of rage against a world uncaringly careening over the edge of collapse. In the releasing of their grip, a feeling of incomplete catharsis, and a hungering for more fueled by a belly emptied by fury.

The negative black contrast to these white-knuckle acts was Kevin Richard Martin’s ‘Subzero’; a single tone, an icy blue, and a choking ambient dub pressure synchronised into a singular image: one hand behind your neck, another placed on your back, holding you beneath the frozen lake. With a glacial grip, Martin progressed through dour drone and steady thump (perhaps the heart, trying to the last to keep your veins full of the hot red stuff), while above us all, a device casting about it smoke and a thin frigid light, reminding us that we’re below, under, beneath. 

Worlds apart, Valentina Magaletti and Upsammy’s opening live set on Sunday came under changing winds. The back corners of the room, shrouded in gentle lighting, befitted the gentle progression of the drums and the synths. The pair weaved well together, Magaletti’s storied skill self-evident (it’s ever a joy to see a master at work) and Upsammy’s ambient-hued live music is a fitting partner; but there was something about the vastness in the audiospace which seemed to yawn wider as time went, wider until it became a gap (def: a space where something is missing). As an album, ‘Seismo’ feels minimalistically complete, pauses pregnant, but in the live setting nothing seemed to be foregrounded; as a rare surge of bass finally reached the crowd, a satisfied cheer from the audience. 

A short walk from our home for four nights, the Planetarium sits on the cusp of the enormous Stromovka park, but we arrive after dark, when the green is most muted, for two short screenings of projections from two separate visual arts studios. In the first, bubbles in the many hues of endangered flowers plunged rapidly down upon the viewer in a snowstorm flurry, and in the second, a blue twisting melee drawn from tidal inspiration, again formed of the same bubbles. Both bore striking similarity to each other, echoing Kredenc’s later admission that, despite efforts to “avoid monotony… patterns are inevitable”. The separated focus on natural matters was a needed cleanser before another dose of mechanical whirr, but people don’t come to Lunchmeat for nature; they come for the product of machines.

Few acts are more synonymous with the diversity of that product than Autechre; their history needs no repeated invocation, other than to illustrate the magnitude of expectation that arrived with their Prague show’s announcement. The duo delivered a thunderous idiomatic journey of their iconically independent sound, the bass piled high even through the tamer opening stretches of their 90-minute marathon, and reaching pummeling weight in the cacophonous sprint finish through grinding whirlwinds of half-comprehensible sound.

For a festival indebted to advanced electronic music, it felt like the cumulative sum of their seventeen years in event-making, but expectation’s dichotomous double-edge was keenly felt: lesser than the palpable anticipation permeating the room, the near-dark sought to be that all-encompassing blackness mandated on the pair’s rider, and what was designed as the unifier of individual experience instead became the individuator. Spectres leer out of the dark, shocking you with their proximity before revealing themselves as shattered fragments of light made sense of by a tired mind; this one I reach out to ward off, but they’re not there at all, while behind me my friend is suddenly crushed by a careless shape, stumbling on its way into the shapes before it. 

Autechre’s performance was paradoxical, a shining crown on a spectre’s brow: after a festival that sought to unstick from pattern and past, to differentiate itself from itself, it seemed to demonstrate the importance, or necessity, for Lunchmeat to continue its journey in interrogating its offering, the essentialism defined by both “new” and “advanced”, and of nurturing its place on the fringe.

All images courtesy of Lunchmeat Festival and the respective photographers.
Discover more on lunchmeatfestival.cz

Nextones Festival 2026 Report

Daniel Blumberg by Martina Nicole Garbin

On the Nature of a Getaway

These slopes carry human traces: centuries of seasonal passage, stone houses, oratories. Walking here is to share time with those traces: feet on stones set by other hands, narrow tracks between walls and bracken, an electronic pulse arriving, dissolving, arriving again. What seems remote becomes immediate in a new register.

For a few days, a sense of shared tending pervades the valley.

There was no coherent type at Nextones, only a temporary convergence of people whose reasons for being there were not necessarily commensurable. Some had crossed borders for a single artist; others arrived with little knowledge of the programme. Some came alone and acquired company almost incidentally. What held them together was maybe the sunburn of a summer that hadn’t fully claimed them yet. Maybe it was simpler than that, the need to get far enough. Nextones pressed people back into a different measure of living.

July, Thursday 16th. First day at Nextones. Set in the Antigorio Valley, at the entrance to Val Formazza, the Premia thermal baths are fed by an underground hyperthermal calcium-sulphate spring. Bodies settle chin-deep in the water, mist across the valley where the mountain drops from view.

Encircled by an almost underwater-y framework, Michela de Mattei and Palm Wine’s Hydromantique settled the audience inside the thermal water, Followed by Miriam Adefris’ arpeggios and glissandos  refrained by and against the baths’ own acoustics.

Underwater, hearing operates under different acoustic conditions. Sound travels through water at roughly four times its speed in air, while the directional cues the human ear relies on above the surface become harder to read. Sound occupies the water around the listener. With the ears submerged, vibration reaches the body. A sense of being held emerges within its transmission. Frequencies seem to travel through, producing an experience that reaches down to the bone.

Friday 17th. By day, the festival dispersed. There was no single site to arrive at, only a route, between Ghesc, the Orridi di Uriezzo, and the Oratory of San Marco in Veglio, a place set by rock, incline, and the water crossing the path.

Between the stone buildings and the vegetation, sound checks from elsewhere in the valley occasionally reached the trail before their source could be seen: electronic frequency arriving ahead of image, the way thunder used to arrive ahead of rain. Groups climbed together, separated, waited, reformed. The festival happened in these transitions as much as it happened on any stage.

At Ghesc, one of the valley’s abandoned maggienghi, Kenichi Iwasa elevated breathing, the most elementary human mechanism, to a compositional element. His two improvised interventions, PONERE+, drew on wind instruments gathered across different geographies, alongside hybrid horns built with artist Charlie Hope. But the inventory misses what happened between instrument and site. Iwasa’s material was air: taken into the lungs, pressured through an object, released into an architecture already capable of answering. A note travelled, struck a wall, returned altered. For several minutes, an abandoned settlement became, again, an acoustic body.

In a culture organised around prediction — recommendation systems predicting desire, platforms predicting attention, models predicting language — improvisation keeps a specific charge; It permits the next moment to remain genuinely unknown. There is a particular vertigo in watching someone commit to a sound before knowing where it leads: no draft, no undo, no version to return to. A rhythm lodged beneath language, a silence that has changed its weight. What disappears here does not vanish without trace but, paradoxically, becomes impossible to discard. 

Iwasa’s improvisation refuses the economy of preservation. It cannot be owned because it never stays identical to itself: it exists once, among these bodies, in this air, under these conditions, and then withdraws. Its disappearance is the completion of the work. Performer and listeners are drawn into the same instability, neither certain where the sound is going, both required to follow anyway. What emerges is a tight knit order that harnesses the audience’s responsiveness to staged chaos without commanding it.

To improvise is to meet the world without first reducing it to expectation. A form of attention rare enough now to feel radical.

When place meets improvisation we have what transportation planning refers to as “desire lines.” Nextone’s ones lead us from the Premia baths to Orridi di Uriezzo; Woods. Then the ground opens. 

The path drops. Trees thicken. The passage narrows between walls of stone carved by the Toce glacier’s meltwater. Holes drilled into stone, debris, a thousand year old trace. 

The gorge has already solved acoustics. Sound gets there first. Voices come back translated. Leaves do more than shade; they edit the air, a strip of sky overhead.

Shane Parish entered with one acoustic guitar and an almost absurd premise: Autechre, whose music seems to belong to systems more than hands, played by fingers on strings. The contradiction held because it wasn’t one. Machine logic, it turned out, could survive without the machine. Precision isn’t proprietary. The scale mismatch did the work. One body. One wooden instrument. A landscape with no author and no audience. Then the music stopped pretending to be separate from the place. Silence wasn’t empty; it was the thing joining everything together. Rocks, roots, breath, resonance; less a collection than a condition. Intimacy arrived as synchronization. Not closeness. Pulse.

Across all three sites, the same inversion kept recurring: the archaic made newly audible through contemporary means, the contemporary made suddenly ancient by contact with stone.

Flash forward to Friday night, and Tones Teatro Natura, a former granite quarry, tells a story that should not be softened into scenery. Rock was once removed from this mountain by force; the vertical walls still carry the record of that extraction. During the pandemic, the site was redeveloped into an open-air theatre, a place made through subtraction now gathers people. That history changes what the stage means. Sound entering these cuts returns, amplified, to a wound the mountain has not closed.

There, Alessandro Adriani and Ariella Vidach’s Koppelia introduced dance to the Nextones programme for the first time, and its lineage carries its own unease. Delibes’s Coppélia already concerns the instability between a living body and its mechanical imitation, behind it E. T. A. Hoffmann’s automaton, whose apparent humanity disturbs the boundary between person and object. An old anxiety meets its contemporary descendant: a human body sharing the performance space with a robotic quadruped, movement passing between organism and machine, gesture captured, translated, returned. What already feels exhausting is the question of whether a machine can convincingly imitate a person. What feels more disturbing is what happens when a person begins adjusting their own movement to a system built to read it. 

In a quarry bearing the marks of one technological transformation of the mountain, body, machine, and extracted rock briefly occupied the same frame, each carrying their own traces.

Traces are one of the, perhaps too many, ways we examine and mediate the world around us. Follow enough traces and you have made yourself a path. Piece enough information together and you can dabble in the sweet art of categorization. Daniel Blumberg worked to dismantle mediation rather than examine it, a practice built from improvisation, abrasion, and contingency, searching for sound at the point before it settles into category. Instruments accumulated. Notes destabilised. 

That uncertainty changed register with Abdullah Miniawy and Simo Cell’s Dying Is the Internet, Miniawy’s voice set against Cell’s dub and electronic constructions, a project built from a contemporary contradiction: digital systems promising limitless connection while producing exhaustion, surveillance, and isolation. Inside the quarry, voices returned to a body standing before other bodies. Words travelled through air rather than a feed. Bass requires no interpretation; it never does. Much of contemporary life reaches the body only after passing through representation, an image of a place, a recording of an event, an application measuring sleep or distance or intimacy. Low frequency bypasses most of that. It touches before it signifies.

Simo Cell’s rhythms fracture underfoot. The release feels damaged.. Then Abdullah Miniawy’s voice enters – wounded, ancestral, unmistakably alive.

Dying Is the Internet leaves the listener mourning what connection once promised. It also raises the question of whether we can still reach one another without turning the encounter into content. Club music for the collapse of the virtual frontier. The album’s existential force lies in that paradox: the internet may be dying, but we do not know where it ends and we begin. And beneath all the machinery is an ancient human terror – not that our technologies will outlive us, but that they have already taught us how to disappear while we are still alive.

Saturday 18th. At the Oratory of San Marco, Laura Masotto’s The Spirit of Things felt like a resurrection. Masotto filled a once-gathering place with violin, electronics, and instruments associated with ritual, held in a state suspended between composition and invocation. A violin is wood until a body activates it; an oratory is stone until people enter it with a shared reason for being there. Ritual is exactly this conversion, matter acquiring consequence through repetition. Masotto’s set continued the oratory’s original purpose, the small movements of an audience trying not to disturb the silence between sounds. Outsiders followed the frequency into this chapel too. The chapel had called its own congregation into being.

Given the chance, the experience would be repeated every day. Silence gave rise to sensations beyond explanation – otherworldly, almost elemental.

Imagine an oratory at the summit of a hike: impossibly small, nearly abandoned, holding an almost contemporary painting of Jesus, an old wooden piano pushed to one side, and only a handful of places to sit. Outside, silence. The earth. An invitation to listen beneath the human world.

It was one of those rare moments when the body feels anatomically close to the earth – close to nature, to place, and to itself. Tears become possible. So does elevation: the sense of crossing to another side and returning. Here, spirits seem to seize the body and carry it inward, deeper than language can follow.

Masotto confronts the listener with the oldest and most violent fact of existence: being alive. The human, the natural, and the historical collapse into one another. Those who have passed and those who remain are suddenly present together. A vibration passes through the soul, binding bodies to one another and, more urgently, to the earth by an invisible thread. In that vibration, existence seems to recognise itself.

Masotto creates a calling – a summons from the universe she brings into being. Leaving becomes unthinkable, then physically impossible. Everyone remains seated, as though something long lost has been recovered and cannot be released. The vibration is so powerful that one longs to inhabit its frequency every second of every day. Rarely does existence feel so near.

The body draws close to its own origin and, strangely, disappears. A threshold opens between matter and spirit, presence and disappearance, life and whatever preceded it. Identity loosens. Every spirit, every form of existence, seems to arrive at once. The universe, the listeners, and the dead become momentarily inseparable. The body is carried away; then, slowly, it emerges into existence again.

Have you ever watched the body from elsewhere? Have you ever felt the soul move beyond it while remaining impossibly close? What lingers is an unsettling, addictive sense of having touched something that existed before the idea of being human.

By night, candles burned around OKO DJ as she opened a book and read. Words entered the quarry, into voice, rhythm and electronics. Carrier’s Rhythm Immortal, performed with Riyo Nemeth’s moving image, carried that dissolution further. John T. Gast drove that pulse into the body.

Helena Hauff’s signature blend of acid, electro and percussion cut through the quarry; beneath an open sky, a deep in the night sensuous release. Hours of jaws set, eyes locked in and spines pulled. Breaths accelerated. Somatic Rituals carried the final hours through bass and percussion beneath bodies that had long stopped needing to know where one set or one state ended.

Four a.m. The drive back cut straight through the mountain’s spine, a tunnel, black and stone-cold, boots echoing off the walls, and then the valley cracked open again: the chapel, candlelight and scripture, bass climbing through granite like it belonged there, bodies still swaying under an open sky.

Exhaustion had sanded everything down: breath, motion, cold skin, the first grey edge of dawn.

By the final day, it had become difficult to separate any single performance from the condition produced across the previous three. The audience is repeatedly required to move, wait, climb, enter, listen, and reassemble ; a structure that resists the frictionless logic governing most contemporary cultural consumption. On Sunday the Nextones Camp, animated by Radio Banda Larga’s stage, hikes, workshops and talks, closed the festival with the unglamorous, essential labour of staying together for one more day.

Long before any festival occupied this valley, other communities organised their lives through these mountains.. The mountain simply imposed terms on their relationship to the terrain. Historical subsistence and a contemporary cultural festival carry different stakes, and it would be dishonest to claim otherwise. Something structural survives the centuries between them: the knowledge that a landscape can organise a body, and that bodies moving through it together can become something other than an audience.

For four days, electronic music entered this existing field of vibration and amplified it into something several hundred people could gather around. Nextones made its audience physically present enough to hear that the valley already had a voice, and asked what other tones might enter it. Body, still here. Alive, and changed by it—hunger. Already wants it back. What we couldn’t anticipate. Perhaps that is what leaves the deepest trace.

All images courtesy of Nextones.
Discover more information on tonesteatronatura.com

Kenichi Iwasa

Kenichi Iwasa

I Leave You To It

“Every conversation is improvisation,” Kenichi Iwasa says. “We’re doing it right now.”

For Iwasa, improvisation is as ordinary as breathing. A room of strangers. A city entered too young. The fragile social choreography of listening, adapting, surviving. After leaving Japan for London as a teenager, moving through art school, underground dance music, squat raves, film, experimental collaboration, and decades inside the city’s improvisational underground, he has built a condition of radical presence.

Breath, brass, handmade horns, live electronics, obsolete machines, glitch, latency: in Iwasa’s work, the moment decides and the instrument leads.

This tension runs through Exotic Sin with Naima Karlsson, through the engineered vulnerability of Krautrock Karaoke, through his relationship to self-built instruments and disappearing live moments. What stays human in a culture defined by prediction, optimisation, constant visibility and the pressure to be endlessly reproducible?

At Nextones he brings that sensibility into direct relation with site, atmosphere and architecture. “The place will tell me,” he says. “Sound will arrive.” Preparation gives way to attention. Sound encounters a place on an unmediated register.

In conversation with NR, Kenichi Iwasa reflects on improvisation as survival skill, collective vulnerability, the strange intelligence of instruments, and the paradox of disappearing while leaving a trace inside somebody else’s recollection. “You are like my external hard drive,” he states. Perhaps that is also what live music asks of us: temporary custodianship of a moment that continues existing inside another body. Perhaps that is the felt truth of a life truly lived.

At Nextones this July, that philosophy will encounter a new landscape. Kenichi Iwasa will build a breath-led composition with a self-made hybrid instrument, folding wind, electronics, and field recordings into the village architecture.

You moved from Japan to London and have spent decades inside its experimental underground. How much of your creative restlessness do you attribute to that original displacement? Does being an outsider in a city help you perceive its structural beauty, or its contradictions, more clearly?

I’ve lived in London for thirty years. When I arrived, I wasn’t really a musician yet, I’d just graduated high school, I was still a kid, so I went to art school. I came from dance music; that was Breakbeat Hardcore, jungle, UK Garage, that kind of time. I was DJing. And then some friends invited me to come to a studio just to jam. I brought some stuff for them, and that’s how I originally started with music.

I began going to squat raves and gigs and late-night parties. It was a shocking experience. You go out and you see so many different kinds of people from different background .I came from a very monocultural place. I don’t think I’d ever spoken to someone from another country until I came here. My whole town, maybe there was one English teacher, that was it.

So coming to London was an enormous shift. And of course art school unlocked a new self, a new identity.

I appreciate certain Japanese values, like being considerate of other people’s space, paying attention to how your actions affect others, and having a strong sense of social awareness.. it’s not something I apply consciously in music, but sometimes I’ll be saying or doing something without thinking, and afterwards I realise: maybe that’s very Japanese haha. It just comes out naturally, I think. There are lot of advantage being Japanese musicians here in the music industries here in London. The Japanese musicians before us have already opened up a really good path for us.

Before finding your solo practice, you spent years moving through bands. What did that friction teach you about the conditions you actually need in order to work?

I played in so many bands, for about fifteen years, over many years. But it was never really suitable for me. A band isn’t for me.

Well, I’m happy to play in a band that performs improvised music, but I wouldn’t really enjoy playing the same songs over and over again.

You trained as an artist and were for some time known as a filmmaker. How did you eventually let music become the primary language, was there a moment, or did it happen gradually?

I was doing a lot of filming and music for a long time, artist talks, music videos, all of it together. But then things with music got busy, and I just stopped doing the film side. Some people still know me as a filmmaker actually. Not anymore, but yeah, I probably started out there. And then music just kind of took over completely.

You came to music through DJing, a practice built on selection, timing, and reading a room. What was it about not planning, about pure improvisation, that eventually became so essential to you?

What drew me in, especially coming from DJing, was that feeling of not knowing what’s coming next. I really enjoy that uncertainty. There’s a kind of tension in it that keeps you fully present and focused. You have to be tuned in to everything at once, staying open but also really aware of what’s happening in the moment.

I don’t come from a formal music background, so I never really started by learning pieces or practising in a structured way. I came into it through improvisation, just responding to sound and feeling rather than playing something already set.

Over time that way of working just became natural to me. It’s less about planning and more about trusting instinct, reacting to the room, and letting things unfold as they happen.

There is a paradox between the Japanese discipline you describe and the freedom of improvisation. Does that tension actually push you toward being more free, more present in the moment?

Yeah, definitely. I think that tension between discipline and improvisation is kind of the point, it doesn’t cancel itself out, it actually pushes things forward. For me, discipline is what creates the freedom. Improvisation doesn’t mean you simply turn up and perform without preparation. it comes from a lot of practic and thinking through different possible situations.

I’m often imagining gig scenarios and working through them in my head, so when I’m actually in the moment, I’m not starting from zero. I’ve done enough improvised shows over the years that it becomes more like a trained instinct. And that’s when you can actually be more present . because you’re not thinking so much, you’re just responding to what’s happening.

Your work often centres on the immediate friction between human breath and digital processing, feeding brass, flutes, handmade woodwinds, and electronics into unstable systems of live performance. Do you view your body as a direct extension of the machine, or is performance an active physical resistance against digital precision?

When the machine reacts unexpectedly, through glitch, latency, feedback, I don’t treat that as an error. It becomes a third presence in the room. That unpredictability is part of what I’m listening for.

I think what draws me to these unstable systems is the same thing that draws me to improvisation itself: you can’t fully predict or control the outcome. The body and the machine are in conversation, not in opposition. Sometimes the machine leads. Sometimes I push back against it. But neither is trying to win.

In Exotic Sin, your work with Naima Karlsson engages deeply with the legacy of Don and Moki Cherry, including the use of Don Cherry’s handbuild horn. How does working with instruments so embedded in personal, artistic, and cultural histories alter your relationship to improvisation?

I met Naima at a friend’s birthday party she’s the granddaughter of Don and Moki Cherry so you can see how there was already this connection and how I eventually came across Don’s horn through that.

We had so many mutual musical friends that we just kept missing each other for a long time. Back then she’d only just started playing piano, not long before we met.

It wasn’t until later, when she invited me out to Sweden where Don and Moki Cherry had lived, that I first came across the horn.

It’s incredible. We think it was made by a Japanese maker, probably in the late 60s or early 70s. It has Japanese characters on it, and even a name engraved: “Mako.” We can’t say for sure, but there’s something really special about it. I’ve never seen another horn like it, and I fell in love with it almost immediately.

That horn actually pushed me into making my own instrument. The sound is so unique, there’s really nothing else like it. I realised I’m more of a straightforward player, I’m more into tones and sound. If I can build something that feels completely mine, that becomes my thing, my weapon in the best possible sense.

Your practice frequently incorporates modified, hybrid, or self-built instruments. What does constructing or reshaping an instrument allow you to access that a finished, standardised instrument cannot? Is imperfection part of an instrument’s intelligence?

Right now I’m working with Charlie Hope, an incredible lighting designer and visual artist, to build my own horn. You might know his work he’s done lighting design for artists like Rebecca Salvadori, Tirzah, Lucy Railton, and a few others.

I really like the idea of collaborating with someone who isn’t a musician or an instrument builder, but who has a completely different way of thinking and really strong technical skills. For me, Charlie just felt like the right person for this. We’ve worked together before me playing music and him doing the lighting but this is the first time we’re actually building an instrument together and that’s what makes it feel special.

We just tested the first prototype and it sounded really good. I was quite moved by it, honestly. I’ve been wanting for a long time to have my own instrument and sound that nobody else has, and this feels like a real step in that direction.

There’s also something important for me about working with someone who isn’t from music. Charlie brings ideas I would never arrive at on my own, and that opens everything up in a really unexpected way. I like that sense of crossing disciplines it pushes things somewhere new.

Do you feel objects and instruments possess their own inherent desire for how they want to sound, or are they ultimately vessels for the performer’s immediate psychic state?

One of the most interesting things is you never really know how it’s going to sound until you actually play it. It makes me wonder if it already has its own voice before I even find it. At the same time, I’m constantly tweaking things, experimenting, trying to steer it towards what feels right, or what feels like its most natural way of speaking. It becomes a kind of dialogue between me and the instrument, always balancing intention and discovery. I say that because I’m working with something that doesn’t really exist yet, so it’s hard to define it in fixed terms. But I’m sure musicians can express so much just through how they approach an instrument, or even their state of mind in the moment. Even a single note can hold a lot of emotion.

You often work with deliberately limited older gear, including 1990s keyboards, alongside live electronics and digital systems. In a culture perpetually obsessed with novelty, what is the value of keeping one foot in the technical materiality of the recent past, and do you think the sound of an era can ever truly be separated from the people who made it?

I just love the sound of old keyboards like Casio keyboards, alongside analogue synths and drum machines. Maybe that’s because those were the tools I first had access to when I started making music.

We tend to define the sound of an era and try to recreate it, but it never quite feels fully achieved. I sometimes wonder if that’s because the energy of that time was simply different, something that can’t really be reproduced in the present.

I’m not really intentionally tied to older gear. I genuinely love new technology. It’s pretty amazing that we’ve reached a point where, with modern DAWs, you can record at a really high quality at home and build full layers of sound on your own, without needing big groups of musicians to bring an idea to life.

Through Krautrock Karaoke, you create a uniquely high-pressure environment, cross-generational groups of musicians, minimal preparation, little rehearsal, and an intentional proximity to uncertainty. Why is it important for you to strip away a musician’s rehearsed safety net?

Early in my career, I was lucky enough to perform with krautrock pioneers like Damo Suzuki, Hans-Joachim Roedelius, and Dieter Moebius. I was also deeply influenced by bands like CAN. That kind of music -simple, repetitive but powerful riffs, with lots of open space felt perfect for group playing, singing along, and layering instrumentation. It suggested a form that was structured enough to follow, but open enough for anyone to enter and contribute.

The idea of “Krautrock Karaoke” started partly as a joke. You can’t really “replicate” krautrock in the same way you would a pop song it’s already loose, open-ended, and resistant to fixed interpretation. So the idea of karaokeing it felt slightly absurd, because karaoke usually relies on clear songs with lyrics and structure. That tension was part of the humour, but also part of the concept.

It first began on my birthday about 13 years ago. From the start, the concept was simple: I would bring together a large number of musicians sometimes 50 to 80 people now days and announce the lineup only the night before. I speak to everyone individually rather than in group messages, and I never reveal the setlist in advance, because I don’t want people rehearsing or locking into expectations. If they knew what was coming, certain dynamics and certain combinations of people might never happen.

I also don’t fully announce the lineup until the night itself. That moment of revelation creates excitement, but also commitment: I tell musicians they’re free not to play if they don’t feellike it, yet they almost always do, because once they see who else is involved, they want to be part of it.

When everyone arrives, things are still quite unclear, and that’s usually where the conversation starts. People talk to each other, ask what’s going on, and try to make sense of it together. That moment feels really important because it naturally builds a sense of community before anyone even plays a note.

My job is basically just to set the scene and let it happen. When people don’t really know what’s coming, they tend to talk more openly, listen a bit better, and react to each other in real time instead of sticking to a plan cos there isn’t one.

Does genuine collective empathy on stage require shared vulnerability, or perhaps even a shared possibility of failure?

Not giving too much information keeps everyone in the space of what’s actually happening in the moment. There’s always a bit of anxiety, but I make that intentional because I want people to communicate with each other. I don’t want things to happen because of me, I want things to happen between them.

There’s a fine line between anxiety and excitement when you’re thrown on stage with a group of musicians to perform a set of some kind. People quickly start connecting in the way musicians naturally do, just through sound.

Sometimes I’ll step in to encourage musicians to get up on stage if it’s needed, but usually what happens is that people start watching each other play and feel that pull to join in. Some might be unsure at first, but by seeing it happen they start thinking, I can do something with

this. And then they end up on stage. Sometimes by the end, everyone has played, sometimes nobody wants to stop.

From those nights I can already tell who might become a future collaborator. A lot of connections have started exactly like that.

A significant part of your practice exists within the temporality of live performance, moments that are never formally tracked, archived, or translated into streaming culture. In an era that increasingly demands total documentation, how do you protect the integrity of the unrecorded moment?

I think about this a lot, the way everything now gets filmed, saved, documented. Even at concerts, it’s rare not to see screens everywhere. I feel like something gets lost in that. It’s not that I’m trying to protect the integrity of the unrecorded moment in some fixed way. If anything, I’m more interested in trying to preserve it in people’s memory instead. The people who were there.

Memory is like a pencil. Always changing. When you remember something, you’re remembering your version of it.And in a way, that feels closer to what a performance actually is than any fixed archive.


Do you feel a performance loses part of its ritual power the moment a camera, archive, or field recorder enters the room?

I’ve got hours and hours of recordings, tapes on tapes from over the years, but I don’t really like going back to them too much. There’s a bit of resistance there. Part of it is I don’t want to lose that sense of “present-ness,” like what I do only fully exists in the moment it happens.

At the same time, I’m aware those recordings were made without an audience, so I’m always asking myself how I can really prove my existence through that.

When I’m performing and everything clicks, I feel like I actually exist in that moment. Something just arrives. The intensity I have on stage is not something I have in everyday life. I don’t even fully understand that version of myself on stage. I just trust it because I can’t really imagine it from the outside, I only remember how it felt.

And that’s the strange thing. I don’t want to disappear, but when I do feel like I kind of disappear on stage, that’s actually what I’m aiming for in a way. To stay in that moment forever. The only trace I leave is in other people’s memory.

In a sense, you are my external hard drive.And maybe that’s what’s so powerful about music. There’s no certainty. You can’t hold it, you can’t touch it, it happens and then it’s gone. People who choose to work like that deserve a lot of respect, because they’re accepting something they can never fully own. But when live music really hits, you know it’s real.

Whether collaborating with artists like Beatrice Dillon, Maxwell Sterling, or Linder Sterling, you are often invited into very precise conceptual or sonic architectures. How do you navigate artistic ego when your role is not necessarily to dominate a space, but to introduce friction, unpredictability, or destabilisation into someone else’s system?

I’m really grateful for it, but also still a bit surprised by it. Everyone I’ve worked with has been very generous. I’m aware there’s a real risk for promoters when they book someone like me, especially someone with no recordings released. But I’ve been around long enough now that trust has built up over time with promoters and collaborators, and I think that’s really what’s kept things going for me.

At the same time, I know it’s not easy for a promoter to build an event around someone like me, so I don’t take that lightly. I feel pretty lucky in that sense.
 
But I also know the challenge is real. I don’t really see myself as a composer or songwriter with a clear vision or something specific I’m trying to impose. It’s kind of the opposite. Iusually go in with nothing fixed. I’m more of a responder. I try to fit into whatever is happening in the best way I can.

When someone starts playing, that first sound gives me the direction, and I build from there. It’s not about being recognised or standing out. I’m not in competition with anyone, I’m just in collaboration.

That also meant that doing solo work was quite difficult at the beginning, because there’s nothing to respond to. So I had to create ways of setting up that situation for myself. I started looping sounds and setting up playback in unpredictable ways, so I wouldn’t know exactly what would come back. That way I still had to react in real time. In a sense, I had to manufacture surprise.

You’ve contributed to sound works within gallery environments such as Lisson Gallery as well as intimate performance spaces like Cafe OTO. How does the geometry, silence, and physical distance of a white cube environment alter your relationship to sound compared to the close proximity of a basement venue?

I’m quite sensitive to all of that, actually. And that’s also why it works for me not to have a fixed set. It means I can adapt. Sometimes you show up with something prepared and the audience is really loud, or it’s a drunk crowd, or it’s a very serious, quiet one—and what you planned just doesn’t fit at all. But I can change things easily. I can just go with whatever is happening.

I end up interacting with so many different musicians and spaces. One thing I’ve noticed is that good musicians usually have amazing ears. It’s not really about how well you play, it’s about how well you listen.

That kind of patience, that level of listening, that’s what I’m always drawn to.

At Nextones, your work will bring breath, live electronics, handmade instrumentation, and architectural environment into direct conversation. When composing for a specific place rather than a conventional stage, do you feel you are composing with a site, or being composed by it?

I looked up the photos, it’s such a beautiful place. I’m really excited to be there. I’m pretty sure the space itself will give me ideas once I’m actually there. When I stand in it, something usually just comes. That’s how I prefer to work.

The only thing I can say in advance is that I’m premiering this horn me and Charlie Hope are making for this show at NEXTONEs, and I’m planning to bring that. But beyond that, I honestly don’t know yet. I don’t really want to decide too much beforehand. I’d rather wait and see what the space does, and what arrives in the moment.That feels like the right way for me to go into it.

Having spent decades embedded in London’s experimental ecosystem while carrying formative experiences from Japan, do you feel improvisation taps into specific geographical or subcultural memories, or does the act itself dissolve national identity and place into something fundamentally non-physical?

I think improvisation does carry geography and memory, but not in a fixed or literal way. Coming from Japan and then spending so many years in London’s experimental scene, those environments are definitely inside me. You can hear it in different instincts how I listen, how I respond, even how patient or direct I am in certain moments. So in that sense, yes, place does stay in the body and comes out in improvisation.

But at the same time, improvisation also dissolves a lot of that. When you’re actually inside it, you’re not really thinking “this is Japan” or “this is London.” You’re just responding to what’s happening in front of you. It becomes very immediate, very physical, and the identity side of it kind of drops away.

So I don’t think it’s either/or. It’s more like those memories and influences are always there, but improvisation doesn’t let them stay neatly separated. It mixes everything together in real time.

There’s a consistency between how you describe making music and how you describe moving through the world, staying open, staying present, resisting the automatic. Is that a philosophy you arrived at consciously, or something the practice taught you over time?

I think it’s important to live the way you perform. If I perform in a certain way but I don’t actually live like that, there’s a contradiction. It doesn’t really feel convincing when it comes across. People are not stupid. They can sense whether you mean it or not.

I want to stay aware of how society is moving, all the time. I don’t want to be the kind of artist who makes work in a sealed room, only surrounded by people who think the same way. As artists, we have a tool to communicate with a much wider range of people, and I think it’s really important to stay aware of what’s happening in the world, to keep updated, and to reflect that in what we do, especially for people who don’t have the same access or perspective.

If you only exist inside your own Instagram algorithm, it can start to feel like that’s the whole world. But it’s not.

So I try to stay in ordinary life as much as I can, just walking around, working alongside people. That’s where I get most of my inspiration from.I think music, or sound more broadly, is one of the most powerful art forms because you can’t really touch it or fully own it in the way you can with something like a painting. It just goes straight into you.

When it hits, it can feel like something you didn’t even know was there gets brought back up. It’s very physical, but it also moves you emotionally in a really direct way.

At Nextones, your work will bring breath, live electronics, handmade instrumentation, and architectural environment into direct conversation. When composing for a specific place rather than a conventional stage, do you feel you are composing with a site, or being composed by it?

I looked up the photos, it’s such a beautiful place. I’m really excited to be there. I’m pretty sure the space itself will give me ideas once I’m actually there. When I stand in it, something usually just comes. That’s how I prefer to work.

The only thing I can say in advance is that I’m premiering this horn me and Charlie Hope are making for this show at NEXTONEs, and I’m planning to bring that. But beyond that, I honestly don’t know yet. I don’t really want to decide too much beforehand. I’d rather wait and see what the space does, and what arrives in the moment.That feels like the right way for me to go into it.

Having spent decades embedded in London’s experimental ecosystem while carrying formative experiences from Japan, do you feel improvisation taps into specific geographical or subcultural memories, or does the act itself dissolve national identity and place into something fundamentally non-physical?

I think improvisation does carry geography and memory, but not in a fixed or literal way. Coming from Japan and then spending so many years in London’s experimental scene, those environments are definitely inside me. You can hear it in different instincts how I listen, how I respond, even how patient or direct I am in certain moments. So in that sense, yes, place does stay in the body and comes out in improvisation.

But at the same time, improvisation also dissolves a lot of that. When you’re actually inside it, you’re not really thinking “this is Japan” or “this is London.” You’re just responding to what’s happening in front of you. It becomes very immediate, very physical, and the identity side of it kind of drops away.

So I don’t think it’s either/or. It’s more like those memories and influences are always there, but improvisation doesn’t let them stay neatly separated. It mixes everything together in real time.

There’s a consistency between how you describe making music and how you describe moving through the world, staying open, staying present, resisting the automatic. Is that a philosophy you arrived at consciously, or something the practice taught you over time?

I think it’s important to live the way you perform. If I perform in a certain way but I don’t actually live like that, there’s a contradiction. It doesn’t really feel convincing when it comes across. People are not stupid. They can sense whether you mean it or not.

I want to stay aware of how society is moving, all the time. I don’t want to be the kind of artist who makes work in a sealed room, only surrounded by people who think the same way. As artists, we have a tool to communicate with a much wider range of people, and I think it’s really important to stay aware of what’s happening in the world, to keep updated, and to reflect that in what we do, especially for people who don’t have the same access or perspective.

If you only exist inside your own Instagram algorithm, it can start to feel like that’s the whole world. But it’s not.

So I try to stay in ordinary life as much as I can, just walking around, working alongside people. That’s where I get most of my inspiration from.I think music, or sound more broadly, is one of the most powerful art forms because you can’t really touch it or fully own it in the way you can with something like a painting. It just goes straight into you.

When it hits, it can feel like something you didn’t even know was there gets brought back up. It’s very physical, but it also moves you emotionally in a really direct way.


Credits

All images courtesy of the artist.
Discover more information on tonesteatronatura.com
Tickets can be purchased via Dice.


Nextones Festival 2026

Inhabiting Sound: Finding Ourselves in Places

In the Ossola Valley, a former granite quarry operates as one of Italy’s recognised music production centres. Tones Teatro Natura, redeveloped during the pandemic years, transformed a site of extraction into permanent cultural infrastructure. Two stages are embedded directly into rock.

Since 2019, the collaboration between Tones on the Stones Foundation and Threes Productions has positioned Nextones within this terrain as a research-driven platform for electronic and audiovisual practices. The festival does not circulate through neutral venues; it develops in response to geological scale and acoustic conditions.

This trajectory of immersive research follows a legacy of site-specific milestones at the quarry, including previous iterations by Richie Hawtin, Caterina Barbieri, and Nicolas Jaar, which established the site as a premier European stage for audiovisual dialogue. 

In a world that scatters us outward, Nextones demands we turn inward. The experience is anchored by sound that roots the body, landscapes that hush the mind, and a shared presence that reclaims our essence. This is a defiant return to what has always waited: ourselves, embodied and alive in the listening.

Nextones, in its thirteenth edition from 16 to 19 July 2026, reframes electronic and experimental music as a re-entry into the body, the mind, and the living organism of place.

The valley already carries its own rhythm, defined by granite quarries marked by labour, gorges shaped by water, and medieval hamlets suspended in partial restoration. Tones Teatro Natura remains the festival’s core. The site’s vertical rock walls shape acoustics in a way no temporary stage could replicate, allowing sound to amplify the body’s innate resonance with the earth.

Nextones has evolved into a recurring ecosystem. With a footprint that has grown to 5,000 attendees, the festival’s core is defined by 600 campers who treat the four-day itinerary as a collective immersion. The community moves from the early-morning radio broadcasts of the Nextones Camp to the narrow, rock-hewn corridors of the Orridi di Uriezzo.

The 2026 program unfolds across multiple sites. The festival’s inaugural ritual on Thursday, 16 July, centers on the fluidity of the Terme di Premia. Here, Miriam Adefris’s harp solo operates in tension with the baths’ acoustics, creating an immersive dialogue where water and humidity warp perception. This is a spatial ritual reclaiming our deepest pursuit: pure, unfiltered being.

On Friday and Saturday, the focus shifts to the Tones Teatro Natura, a former site of industrial extraction transformed into a permanent cultural forge. Embedded directly into the vertical granite, the stages amplify the audiovisual weight of the program: Carrier’s rhythmic minimalism expands against the rock’s mass, while John T. Gast’s site-specific set utilizes the quarry’s sheer scale as a physical instrument. OKO DJ develops an A/V performance drawing from As Above, So Below (Stroom, 2025), integrating electronics, acoustic instrumentation and film by Hajj.

Helena Hauff and OK Williams extend the club dimension of the festival with DJ sets grounded in acid, EBM, jungle and house, maintaining physical intensity within the open-air setting.

Sunday 19 July shifts toward the Nextones Camp, animated by Radio Banda Larga’s stage. The day includes live sets, broadcasts and shared activities, reinforcing the camp as daily meeting point.

Threshold sites expand the geography. Performances at the Orridi di Uriezzo integrate sound within narrow rock formations, while live sets at the abandoned village of Ghesc engage with architectural remains and historical memory.

By focusing on the micro-textures of the sediment rather than the panoramic spectacle, the 2026 visual identity, captured by Rachele Daminelli, underscores the festival’s true intent. The valley is not a backdrop, but a living organism.

Rachele Daminelli, Nextones Festival Campaign (2026)
Rachele Daminelli, Nextones Festival Campaign (2026)
Rachele Daminelli, Nextones Festival Campaign (2026)

With the second announcement, the programme expands. New presences enter the
landscape as distinct forces: Abdullah Miniawy and Simo Cell bring Dying is the Internet,
where poetic rupture meets bass weight; Alessandro Adriani and Ariella Vidach unfold
Koppelia, dissolving the boundary between body and digital double through motion
capture; Daniel Blumberg arrives with a live set shaped by improvisation and exposure.
Alongside them, figures such as DJ Hell, Nosedrip, and Somatic Rituals extend the
programme into the language of the club without detaching it from the site.

The final announcement completes the program by shifting attention to daytime activations. Across
Ghesc Village, the Oratorio di San Marco in Veglio, the Premia Thermal Baths, and the Orridi di
Uriezzo, listening becomes spatial.
At the thermal baths, Michela de Mattei with Palm Wine present Hydromantique, an underwater
listening environment where voice and sound move through submerged space and extend into a
continuous installation. In Ghesc, Kenichi Iwasa builds a breath-led composition with a self-made
hybrid instrument, folding wind, electronics, and field recordings into the village architecture.
At the Orridi di Uriezzo, Shane Parish translates Autechre into acoustic form, letting geological
structure shape rhythm and resonance. In Veglio, Laura Masotto turns the violin into a ritual
instrument, moving between composition and improvisation inside the Oratorio di San Marco. The
terrain becomes a collaborator.

At Nextones, sound meets stone to redefine the map of Italian contemporary culture, proving that
the most forward-thinking frequencies are often found in the most ancient foundations.

As one of the first Italian festivals to achieve ISO 20124 certification for sustainable management, the project views environmental stewardship not as a constraint, but as a core component of the artistic experience. 

Produced by Tones on the Stones Foundation and Threes Productions, and supported by national and regional institutions, Nextones continues to operate as a music production centre rooted in specific terrain. Here, in the Ossola Valley, sound meets stone. The encounter defines the experience.

Credits

Nextones Festival Campaign Frames. All images courtesy of Rachele Daminelli.

Discover more information on tonesteatronatura.com
Tickets can be purchased via Dice.

Polifonic Festival 2026

Seismic Core: Puglia’s Limestone Forge

At dawn in Valle d’Itria, the bass reverberates across the landscape. Here, at Polifonic, the future is rooted in limestone and lived culture.

In Italy, the South has long been framed as image: coastline, ritual, nostalgia, summer. Narrated as origin yet treated as periphery, it is often romanticized while structurally sidelined, rarely positioned as generator of contemporary infrastructure. When Polifonic emerged in Monopoli in 2017, it did not “arrive” in the South as an external intervention. It surfaced from within it.

Cosmic disco flickered in Adriatic clubs in the 1970s. Neapolitan fusion, through figures such as Tullio De Piscopo and Pino Daniele, traced blues inflected pathways toward early house. In Salento, pizzica rhythms collided with sound system culture; Bari’s post-industrial voids hosted off-grid teknivals. Long before the Masseria party became an aesthetic, a southern continuum was already in motion, feeding off Europe’s underground from its margins.

Polifonic began in Puglia in 2017 to fuse electronic music’s raw energy with the region’s ancestral landscapes and “Mediterranean spirit.” Organizers chose the heel of Italy’s boot: its Adriatic beaches, olive groves, and trulli, creating an immersive counterpoint to European festivals. Monopoli’s shores hosted the debut as a boutique escape, blending house, techno, and disco with Puglia’s wind-whipped authenticity, instantly positioning the South as electronic music’s hidden pulse. This territorial bond, not coincidence, birthed a phenomenon that internalizes Puglia’s heritage into global infrastructure. The groundwork for electronic hybridity already existed. Polifonic recognized the frequency.

When the pandemic suspended physical gatherings, Polifonic extended that continuity through its record label, launched in 2021. Rather than pause, it translated territorial sound into material form. Vinyl became both archive and export channel, allowing Puglia’s club language to travel while its physical stages remained silent.

The project’s northward expansion, particularly through Milan’s City Echoes series, inverted the traditional Italian cultural hierarchy. Instead of the South migrating symbolically toward the center, the center began absorbing southern cadence.

For its 2026 edition, from 22 to 26 July in the Valle d’Itria, Polifonic presents a program that consolidates its curatorial standing within Europe’s electronic landscape and reaffirms the South as author.

A total of 63 artists will perform across three primary locations: Masseria Capece, Cala Maka and Le Palme Beach Club. The lineup unfolds as a single continuous narrative, traversing historic pioneers, international icons, visionary live acts and new trajectories of global club culture. Among the defining moments stands the b2b between Carl Craig and Moodymann, an encounter between two Detroit architects whose dialogue spans techno, house, soul and jazz, repositioned inside Apulian limestone.

Voices From The Lake inaugurates the Masseria chapter with a live performance on the Stone Stage, located inside the quarry itself. From Thursday onward, Masseria Capece hosts three consecutive days for the first time in the festival’s history, intensifying its territorial immersion. Artists rotate across four stages, allowing research-driven selectors such as Ben UFO, Lena Willikens, Prosumer, Craig Richards and Nicolas Lutz to coexist with live acts including Shackleton, A Guy Called Gerald, Chet Faker, Sola and Vardae.

The curatorial arc bridges experimental edge and club momentum: Djrum’s hybrid breakbeat architecture, Samaʼ Abdulhadi’s hypnotic techno rooted in identity, and Donato Dozzy’s Roman minimal lineage coexist with Tiga’s global imprint and MACE’s cross-disciplinary construction, where Italian production culture intersects with narrative electronic form. Projects such as Hiver presents Night Heron and Karnak On Acid extend the festival’s research-driven axis.

The closing returns to the sea at Le Palme Beach Club, sealing the five-day arc in a coastal atmosphere that reintroduces horizon and salt air into the circuit.

With the 2026 theme, Sensory Bloom, listening becomes physical again: light, space and sound calibrated to heighten perception. The experience circulates from individual body to collective organism.

This sensorial emphasis extends beyond music alone. Carefully designed stages, immersive installations and a curatorial focus on inclusivity and balance reinforce Polifonic’s identity as more than lineup.

From a 2017 Monopoli shoreline, the project has expanded through records, northern editions and international outposts, without severing its territorial anchor. Rooted at Masseria Capece amid trulli and olive groves, it continues to evolve as a Made in Italy structure with transnational reach.

What began on a southern shoreline now reverberates across cities that once defined the center. To recognize a frequency is to shift the map. And when the map shifts, culture follows.

Discover more information on polifonic.it
Tickets can be purchased via Dice.


City Echoes Milan 2025

An echo begins where presence ends. It travels through distance and matter, with new forms, new meanings. What begins as vibration becomes reflection, architecture, trace: an unfolding memory. Echoes persist beyond rhythm. Even long after the last note, they inhabit the mind, soul and body — a silent gesture, an oral memory of inspiration whispered across generations. What remains when an afterimage emerges. In this lingering vibration, the city itself begins to hum. What we call urban life is nothing more than the overlapping reverberations of being, of the very human existence, of expression.


City Echoes is a reverberation made visible. The city becomes an instrument, the listener an echo and sound, the moment. A memory of what the present leaves behind.
Each genre, from experimental to house, techno to bass, unfolds as a distinct resonance. What remains is no longer the notes alone, but their afterlife: a vibration that maps the invisible cartography of Milan’s collective pulse.

From November 20 to 23, 2025, the city becomes a field of resonance: five venues, from Triennale Cuore and VOCE to Alcatraz, Basic Village and Mogo Hi-Fi. Across these, sound is embodied, expanding into light, gesture and collective emotion. Each vibration becomes a trace, a sonic imprint.

Born in Valle d’Itria and rooted in the cultural depth of Italy, Polifonic has long treated music as a language of encounter between disciplines, geographies and generations. With City Echoes, this ethos finds a new dimension: a celebration of sound as a living architecture and of Milan as its resonant host.

On Thursday, November 20, the festival opens at Triennale Cuore and Triennale VOCE with a dialogue between density and release, emotion and distortion. Mun Sing brings a visceral live set where bass music and abstract electronics collide. Yas Reven follows with cinematic, introspective layers, while Z.I.P.P.O. closes with his signature blend of atmosphere and precision, transforming the dancefloor into an immersive, communal space. Earlier that evening, Frontiers of Light and Space, a conversation with Anonima Luci, explores how light design can act as a language of architecture, a sensorial extension of the spaces we inhabit.

On Friday, November 21, Triennale Cuore and VOCE move toward a subtler kind of resonance, one made of patience, intuition and rhythm. Francesco Del Garda crafts a hypnotic flow of minimalism and groove, while Nicola Mazzetti traverses deep house and experimental textures, shaping a sonic journey suspended between elegance and instinct. A listening session curated by t-mag opens the evening, reflecting on the politics of listening and the act of being present, tuning into the spaces between sounds.

On Saturday, November 22, Triennale Cuore and Alcatraz embody expansion. The much-anticipated back-to-back between Flore and Piezo merges bass, club experimentation and rhythmic play, a meeting of two sonic minds in constant motion. John Talabot follows with a set of emotional depth and luminous texture, leading into Richie Hawtin’s DEX EFX X0X, an exclusive performance for Italy that blurs the boundaries between human gesture and technological intuition.

Sister Effect closes with a magnetic presence that binds the night together. Earlier that day, City Echoes hosts an Ableton Workshop with Flore and Piezo, a deep dive into process, texture and intuition, guided by two long-time Ableton Certified Trainers.

On Sunday, November 23, Basic Village and Mogo Hi-Fi turn toward introspection and ritual. Leo Mas channels the primal energy of rhythm into enveloping grooves at Mogo Hi-Fi, followed by Or:la, whose set weaves techno, breakbeat and bass into a dark and luminous continuum. The Milan-based duo Hiver present Night Heron, a project between ambient, downtempoand electronic pulse. Amidst the sound, e/tape leads a Sound Bath Experience, an immersive session where vibration becomes a form of collective healing Simultaneously, Conxi Sane paints live throughout the day, transforming gesture, rhythm and pigment into a living artwork that evolves with the music, a visual echo of sound in motion.

Here, music is not consumed. It is absorbed. Every sound leaves an echo. Some fade quickly; others, born of true resonance, transform all.

Discover more information via www.polifonic.it
Tickets can be purchased via Dice.


Credits

  1. Polifonic. Photography Vittorio La Fatta
  2. Richie Hawtin. Photography Sima Dehgani

Athens Epidaurus Festival 2025 

Athens is a city that resists metaphor. It does not stand in for history; it is history, unfolding in real time. To arrive here during Subset was not to attend a festival, but to step into an atmosphere dense with texture: conceptual, sonic, civic. What unfolded across the weekend was not simply a program of performances, but a series of durational states: of attunement, permeability, and ecstatic stillness.

Subset operates as a proposition, one that asks the listener to relinquish mastery, to dwell in uncertainty, to encounter sound as condition rather than content. Athens responded in kind. Its terrain, fractured, layered, and perpetually in flux, held the festival with an uncanny fluency. The city’s ambient frequencies folded into the works, becoming a porous substrate through which performance and place co-articulated. Everything felt permeable, just beneath language.

Christina Vantzou opened the weekend at the Athens Conservatoire, and in many ways it was an initiation. The space itself, solemn and precise, seemed to recognize the gravity of the moment. But it was the crowd that moved me most: a quiet density of intellect and curiosity, gathered from all corners of the world. Vantzou’s performance unfolded not in front of us, but around us. Her compositions invited a kind of listening that is almost extinct, one that demands the body.

The work stressed the pure form of existence: listening stripped of spectacle, of signal, of distraction. A reintegration of the ear not as a passive receiver, but as a site of encounter. To listen, here, was to inhabit the moment with one’s full physicality. It was a radical slowing down, a surrender to the temporal grain of sound. A rare moment of reintegration. The ear, often reduced to a passive conduit, was here reclaimed as a site of encounter, a threshold through which time, breath, and matter could converge. Hers was a poetics of embodied listening and letting presence accumulate.

At the Stavros Niarchos Foundation Cultural Center, Renzo Piano’s architectural meditation on openness and light, MONOM’s spatial sound dome emerged not as a venue, but as a vessel. Walking through the surrounding park, where olive trees serve as temporal anchors and the sea glints at the periphery, one approached the dome less as a structure than as a frequency field.

Sound moved through the spine, the chest, the base of the skull. A full collapse occurred between interior and exterior. MONOM made porous the boundaries we so carefully uphold: between self and world, between rhythm and rest. It was meditative, yes, but also deeply physical. It compelled stillness and invited motion, as if the body had momentarily forgotten where it ended and the sound began.

Suzanne Ciani’s Improvisation on Four Sequences opened with analog synthesis rendered in fluid geometries, sketching a speculative grammar of resonance. Evita Manji’s Echo(location) chamber is a refracted emotional architecture, as if longing had been spatialized and given breath. Cinna Peyghamy summoned tactility from pressure and pulse, folding ritual into modulation with almost surgical clarity. Andrea Belfi’s Above My Door, There Is Knocking activated what lay dormant just beyond the threshold. A sonic ecology that expanded the architecture of listening just slightly beyond the edge of the body. 

Where Vantzou dissolved the self and MONOM absorbed it, Ryoji Ikeda reconfigured it. His performance dealt in extremes: of data, of frequency, of form. His precision was almost surgical, excising time into units and spatializing mathematics into physical sensation.

There is a rigor to his practice that resists spectacle and yet produces awe. Frequencies carved through the space like scalpel lines. Data was not visualized; it was enacted, rendered as intensity. The room did not move. It held. The audience, silent and still, was algorithmically synchronized. There is something devotional in Ikeda’s refusal to soften, a kind of purity that exceeds expression. Pure intelligence.

Cafés became informal extensions of the program, where conversations unraveled like marginalia: speculative, embodied, unresolved. A city shaped by interruption and multiplicity, it offered not stability but resonance. In the rhythm of its streets, in the slow generosity of its pauses, Athens enacted what Subset proposed. To listen is not to extract meaning, but to remain in proximity to it.

Subset does not curate spectacle. It curates conditions. Its intelligence is not in its scale, but in its sensitivity, a careful orchestration of slowness, density, and attention. It does not speak over. It listens. And in Athens, a city fluent in dissonance and return, that listening became something more than practice. It became epistemological. It became political. Not resistance in the usual sense, but resonance as mode — as method, as ethics, as form. 

Subset Festival Athens

Now in its third edition, Subset Festival  is rapidly establishing itself as one of the most forward-thinking and culturally significant platforms in Greece’s contemporary music scene. Curated by composer and sound artist Stavros Gasparatos,  the Athens-based festival becomes a dynamic reflection of a broader cultural shift: where experimental sound, technology, and performance are not sidelined but brought to the forefront of Greece’s artistic discourse.

Launched in 2023 as part of the historic Athens Epidaurus Festival, Subset offers more than just a programme, it builds a much-needed space for contemporary and experimental music within a country still negotiating the balance between tradition and the avant-garde. “When I first proposed Subset, my goal was to create a space that can support and connect the vibrant Greek artistic community working in these fields,” says Gasparatos. “I want a platform that commissions new works, highlights the wealth of talent based in Athens, and opens up meaningful exchanges with leading figures from the international experimental scene.”

Rooted in the cultural heart of Athens and co-produced with the Athens Conservatoire,  the 2025 edition of Subset expands this vision even further. It brings together global pioneers and local innovators across venues such as the Athens Conservatoire and the SNFCC, presenting a bold conversation between music, movement, spatial sound, and digital media. The lineup features international figures like Lyra Pramuk, Mouse on Mars, Suzanne Ciani, Carmen Villain, and Ryoji Ikeda, alongside a new generation of Greek artists actively redefining the local scene.

Notably, the Athens Epidaurus Festival itself does not shy away from forward-thinking music either, will present Arca’s debut in Greece on May 31st, marking a landmark addition to the festival’s evolving identity. Live in Athens from the iconic Lycabettus Theater in celebration of the Festival’s 70th anniversary, Arca will be supported by local Greek musician and fellow PAN-signee, Evita Manji, and with a DJ set from local Porschelane. The performances will be followed by Subset’s opening celebration, doubling as the afterparty for the Concert and developed in close collaboration with Plural Artist Management and NR Magazine. Taking place in a raw brutalist basement in the centre of Athens, it features boundary-pushing DJ sets from Apu Nanu, Bapari, Bobby Beethoven, Engalanan, Evita Manji, Oldyungmayn, Safety Trance and Wicboyx. The lineup resists easy categorisation: deconstructed club rhythms, ambient textures, reggaeton mutations, and rave atmospheres converge in a night that celebrates genre fluidity and radical expression.

As Plural Artist Management notes, “Subset Festival represents a well-intentioned shift from the traditional Theater, Dance and Performing Arts programme that Athens Epidaurus Festival is known for. As such, it positions itself as an expansive addition to summer in Greece, and has attained well-deserved praise for its openness to collaborate and invest in ‘one-of-one’ artists.”

A visual recap of the afterparty and select DJ sets are set to be published exclusively on NR in the coming days, capturing the charged energy that opens the festival.

At its core, Subset is not just an event but an evolving platform for cultural dialogue. “Another key aspect of Subset is fostering collaboration across disciplines and backgrounds,” Gasparatos explains. “The festival actively encourages hybrid projects that blur boundaries—between genres, between artists, and between audiences.” This spirit of experimentation defines Subset’s role in today’s Greece: a space where adventurous ideas can take root, and new artistic vocabularies can emerge.

Additionally, Athens Epidaurus Festival has also initiated a first-time collaboration between the Stavros Niarchos Foundation Cultural Centre and Berlin-based spatial sound studio MONOM, which will present both Live and Archive works presented across 6 days at the SNFCC Dome. “The partnership with MONOM is, for us, an especially fruitful result of Athens Epidaurus Festival’s ambition to experiment, and an effort to offer the public some insight into new technologies surrounding music/sound creation. With projects from two artists on the agency presented daily [Cinna Peyghamy and Evita Manji, who is Greek] as part of the Archive Works, we’re excited for audiences to experience this new format.” says Plural Artist Management. 

In a country shaped by both rich heritage and a restless, forward-looking generation, Subset feels like a timely signal. Here experimental sound doesn’t just exist in the periphery, it belongs on the main stage of Greek cultural life.

Find full details on the Athens Epidaurus Festival website for all concerts, and secure a spot via Resident Advisor for the afterparty – tickets are limited.

Cinna Peyghamy

Auditory Matter as Ritual Form and the Space Between

What does it mean to truly listen, not as a passive gesture but as a radical, embodied act of attention? In a culture shaped by speed and spectacle, listening offers a slower kind of presence. One rooted in care, intimacy, and transformation. One that moves beneath language.

Cinna Peyghamy brings us into contact with the spatial texture and weight of sound. Moving between percussion and electronics, field energy and sculptural precision, his work challenges the idea of listening. Here, sound is force. It’s matter. It’s ritual. With a background in science and a commitment to improvisation, Cinna treats sound as a phenomenon to be shaped, inhabited, and released. In this conversation, he speaks of silence as suspension, of performance as a state beyond thought, and of listening as a sensual, even sacred act.

This conversation coincides with the presentation of Cinna Peyghamy’s spatial sound work within the AEF x SNFCC x MONOM program in Athens. Developed in collaboration with MONOM and originally conceived for the 4DSOUND system, the piece deepens Peyghamy’s exploration of vibration, resonance, and embodied sonics. Here, sound is not treated as discrete, rather as a sensorial continuum to be entered, absorbed, and metabolised. The work resists the notion of performance as delivery; instead, it unfolds as a durational ecology of attunement, shaped by presence, porosity, and mutual transformation.

What happens when we reopen the ear , not only as a site of perception, but as a threshold for memory, identity, and transformation? How might deep, embodied listening allow us to access the invisible architectures that shape who we are , internal time, ritual, spiritual resonance , and reorient us toward a more fluid, post-human understanding of self? In a world saturated by visual dominance and extraction logics, can listening become a quiet form of resistance, a way to transmit emotion, reimagine presence, and dissolve boundaries between body, landscape, technology, and the unknown?


That’s such a deep and fascinating question. I always like to start by saying that sound doesn’t need images to be understood. Hearing is one of our most fundamental senses, but it’s also a way of perceiving the world across different timelines and intensities. Whether you’re in a concert hall or walking through a forest, sound is something you can feel. It surrounds you, it moves through you. It’s not abstract—it’s physical.

In French, we use the word matière to describe sound. It means material, something tactile. And I treat it like that—as something I can shape, mold, and work with like clay. Unlike vision, which we can close off easily, we can’t simply choose not to hear. You can close your eyes, but you can’t close your ears. That makes sound uniquely intimate, but also inescapable. It reaches you whether you invite it or not.

Orson Welles once said something about how we’re addicted to images, and I think that’s still true. We live in a visual culture. But sound is older. In nature, it’s how animals protect themselves. It’s how a child cries for its mother. It’s primal. And yet we tend to treat it as background. I’m interested in what happens when we bring it back to the foreground.

How do you see sound as a source of transformation?
Sound is transformation. It is energy in motion. A wave doesn’t move matter, but it transfers force. It literally reshapes the space around us. It changes how the air behaves. When a wave hits the ear, it gets translated into electric signals in the brain—and that translation becomes emotion, memory, sensation. So even before you attach meaning, sound is already doing something to you. That’s the level I’m working on. The invisible level that still leaves an imprint.

When you’re composing, how does that sense of energy and space influence your creative process?

I often describe myself as a two-faced musician. I play acoustic instruments, but I also compose electronic music. My work lives in the space between—electrifying the acoustic and bringing acoustic resonance into the electronic world. That duality is everything to me.

The way energy feels is completely different depending on the source. When I’m playing percussion, I’m the source. I create the sound. My hand hits the skin, I feel the feedback in my body. There’s a direct, muscular relationship to the sound. But when I’m composing electronically, I’m working with machines and software. The speaker becomes the voice—but it’s designed, manufactured, mediated. It’s a different intimacy.

At the computer, I’m focused on texture, weight, spatial balance. How do the frequencies sit? Where does the bass fall in the room? But when I’m performing live, it’s almost athletic. I think about posture, hand coordination, physical stamina. It’s about staying attuned to the space and what it’s asking for. One is psychological, the other is fully embodied. Both are necessary.

Silence and decay seem as present in your work as tone and rhythm. What is the function of absence in your compositions? Is there a kind of sacredness in withholding sound?

Absolutely. There’s a quote often attributed to Chopin—”Silence is music”—and I believe it. But silence is difficult. Most people are afraid of it. Even outside of music, silence in conversation can feel awkward, like something you need to fill. But I think silence is also peace. It’s immobility. It slows things down. It invites reflection.

Silence functions very differently depending on the space. If I’m performing in a church, silence has weight. It echoes. You can use it to stretch time, to create tension, to let something land. In a club, it’s trickier. Silence exposes the background—the bar noise, the chatter, the bodies. It’s more fragile. But even then, it can be powerful if you trust it.

When I’m composing, I often return to a track and realize I’ve said too much. Why is there so much happening? Did I really need that many layers? Maybe not. Subtraction is a tool. You remove until you’re almost at silence—but not quite. That in-between space is where I try to live. That equilibrium, where presence and absence are in dialogue. It’s a place of heightened listening.

How did your collaboration with MONOM influence the way you think about resonance, space, and performance?

I worked with MONOM in May 2024. Usually, artists do a residency and create a fixed piece using their 4DSOUND system. But from the beginning, I knew I didn’t want to compose a finished work. My practice is rooted in improvisation. I never go on stage knowing exactly what I’ll play. That’s what makes each performance alive.

The MONOM system is incredibly complex—more than 50 speakers in a multidimensional space. With the spatial sound engineer, we adapted my usual stereo live set into a format that could move through that environment. I didn’t write anything in the traditional sense. I treated the space as an instrument and trained myself to play it.

Every day during the residency, I practiced, improvised, tested gestures. How does a frequency move across the room? How can I shape it in real time without hiding behind a screen? We developed a system that let me perform the room. The final show was fully improvised, like always. But it felt different. I had to react instantly to what I was hearing. That concert was recorded and will be presented at Subset. It’s a piece made entirely of live responsiveness.

What does it feel like to perform in that way?
When I perform, I enter a very specific state. I’m not thinking. I’m not planning. It’s like a small inner sphere—me, my drum, my synth. My hands are doing the work. I let them think for me.

It doesn’t matter if there are ten people or a thousand. The focus is the same. It’s not about control. It’s about attainment. The performance reflects the space, the mood, the temperature, the breath in the room. Everything affects everything. I like to compare it to walking a tightrope. You can’t lose balance for even a second. That’s what keeps it alive.

Questions from Christina Vantzou:
Is there a sound you
’ve always wanted to hear but haven’t been able to?

I’ve always wanted to hear the sound of an earthquake. Not buildings falling, not the aftermath. I mean the sound the earth itself makes when it moves. That ultra-low frequency that we can’t quite access. It’s probably more of a vibration than a sound. But I hope one day we’ll find a way to hear it.

Would you say sound exists more on a cosmic level or a sensual one?

Sensual, definitely. What we talked about at the beginning—sound goes through you. It wraps around you. It touches you. That’s the core of it. It’s bodily. It’s intimate. It’s a feeling.

Photography · Payram
Discover more on aefestival.gr

Carmen Villain

Auditory Presence as Psychic Topography and the Politics of Listening

What does it mean to truly listen, not as a passive gesture but as a radical, embodied act of attention? In a culture shaped by speed, visibility, and extraction, listening offers a different kind of presence. One that resists control, invites transformation, and asks us to be changed in the process. This conversation begins with the ear: not just as a site of sonic perception, but as a threshold for memory, time, identity, and relation. What if the ear, long relegated to the background, became central to how we move through the world? What if listening could dissolve the boundaries between body and landscape, self and other, language and emotion? One rooted in care, intimacy, and attention. One that moves beneath language.

Carmen Villain moves through this space with rare clarity. As a composer, producer, and multi-instrumentalist, her work resists resolution and leans into resonance. She scores what lingers in the in-between: ambient yet pointed, spectral yet grounded. Through layered textures and dilated time, she traces the emotional and psychic topographies of sound. In Villain’s world, listening is not a tool but a threshold, a portal into what slips beneath language, dissolves certainty, and refuses closure.

This interview unfolds within NR’s experimental series, a conceptual relay where three artistic voices respond to a unified theme. A living structure, each conversation blurs authorship, embracing intuition, curiosity, and the space between voices. What emerges is not a fixed exchange but a shared vibration.

This particular conversation unfolds following Villain’s live performance at Subset Festival in Athens on June 5, 2025, where she presented Music from The Living Monument, a durational piece that holds space for slowness, suspension, and subtle transformation. It asks the audience not to grasp but to dwell, not to consume but to become one with. In Villain’s work, listening becomes a site of encounter with the unseen architectures that shape how we relate to time, to space, to each other.

What happens when we reopen the ear, not only as a site of perception, but as a threshold for memory, identity, and transformation? How might deep, embodied listening allow us to access the invisible architectures that shape who we are , internal time, ritual, spiritual resonance, and reorient us toward a more fluid, post-human understanding of self? In a world saturated by visual dominance and extraction logics, can listening become a quiet form of resistance, a way to transmit emotion, reimagine presence, and dissolve boundaries between body, landscape, technology, and the unknown?

Those are big questions. I often think about these themes. Listening, for me, is something entirely different from hearing. I was actually just the other day reading Pauline Oliveros’ Quantum Listening, in which she talks about this distinction: hearing is passive, it just happens. But listening is a decision, an orientation. It unlocks entire worlds.

For example, when I’m outside and hear an unusual sound that catches my ear, the act of recording it forces me to actively listen, which shifts how I relate to the space around me. It sharpens my awareness and connects me to my environment in a deeper way. I become more present. But there’s also this internal listening connected to memory. I can hear or recall sounds in my head, like imagining a flute inside a cave. That imagined echo has a memory attached to it. It’s not just sound, it’s spatial, emotional, associative.

As a musician, deep listening is essential. It’s how I interact with my materials and make creative decisions. But beyond that, it feels like a way of being. A way of tracing memory through sound and finding identity in moments that are fleeting, dislocated, but still resonant.

In a time defined by overstimulation and hyper-visibility, can listening become a form of resistance — a counter-practice rooted in slowness, attention, and care?

Yes, I believe it can. Listening is a powerful tool for cultivating empathy. In a world that often feels overwhelming, with so much negativity, polarization, and noise, listening offers another route. A quieter one. A slower one.

Through listening, we can reach a different kind of understanding. Not just with people, but with landscapes, histories, and emotions. It’s a way of paying attention to what might otherwise go unnoticed. And in that attention, there is care.

Listening can bring us into contact with what lies beneath the surface. It cuts through the quick assumptions we tend to make. It invites us to pause, to receive, and to connect. That, to me, is a form of resistance. Especially now, when speed, distraction, and spectacle dominate. Listening asks something else from us and gives something back in return.

Your work often inhabits sonic in-betweens: fragile, suspended, undefined. What draws you to these liminal states, and how do they shape the emotional or spatial architectures of your compositions?

Honestly, I rarely know what the final result will be when I start. I might begin with a loose idea, a texture I want to explore, or a feeling I’m trying to reach. But I never map it out in a fixed way. It’s more like following sound and letting it guide me somewhere unexpected.

Take The Living Monument score, for example. It was created to accompany extremely slow movement by dancers. I had to imagine the choreography while still in the studio. That meant slowing everything down: sonically, emotionally, perceptually. I had to let the sounds expand and take their time.

I’m drawn to that space, the in-between where things feel suspended. It allows for a kind of openness. The boundaries dissolve a little, and you’re left with something that feels more intuitive than logical. I like not knowing exactly where I’m going. That uncertainty is where a lot of the magic lives.

There’s a temporal softness to your work: sounds stretch, blur, and become immersive. How does this slowing-down allow you to access more intuitive or unconscious states, both for yourself and the listener?

When I stretch a sound over time, I begin to notice details I wouldn’t otherwise hear. It’s like placing a magnifying lens over a moment. The texture opens up, and so does my ability to respond to it.

I enjoy sinking deeply into sounds, allowing them to breathe and unfold. My process is mostly intuitive. I might have some structural guidelines or ideas, but I try to stay flexible. Sometimes the best ideas emerge when I stop trying to control the outcome. It’s about listening to the sound, and listening to myself inside that process.

That slowing-down allows me to enter a different state. Less mental, more sensory. And I think it allows the listener to do the same.


Question from Cinna Peyghamy:
Do you consciously seek out the unheard, to create sounds that challenge expectations or dissolve the known edges of genre, voice, or instrument?

Absolutely. I love the challenge of morphing sounds, reshaping them until they become unrecognizable yet still intimate. It’s like a form of sonic treasure hunting.

In collaborating with visual artists I might start with a suggestion or a prompt. For example, for the Living Monument score, the choreographer Eszter Salamon gave me a feeling, a texture, even a color, and from there I begin trying to push the material beyond conventional limits. 

The goal in my music isn’t novelty for its own sake. It’s about arriving at something that feels emotionally specific, something that sounds like me. That search keeps me excited. It keeps the work alive.

You’re about to perform Music from The Living Monument at Subset Festival in Greece, your first time performing there. What does this performance mean to you, and how do you anticipate the work unfolding in that context?

I’m really looking forward to it. I’ve never played in Greece before, so it feels special. Performing The Living Monument in a live context is something I cherish. It’s a piece that invites me to go deep into the sound and let it sit, let it breathe for a long time.

I’m excited to see how it resonates in the space and how the audience listens with me. That mutual attention, that quiet exchange, is what makes these moments feel meaningful.

Discover more on aefestival.gr

Subscribe to our
Newsletter